Covid Vaccines Are Brilliant and Safe

15

The Covid vaccines are incredibly safe. With 11,934,316,168 doses administered and tens of millions of lives saved we know a lot about them. They have been transformational, allowing us to move from mass house arrest to normal living. And when we do catch the disease now it is much milder, due partially to long term T cell immunity conferred by the vaccine.

Vaccines, by their very nature, cause a lot of side effects. Temporary sore arms and sore chests. Take these away and the number of Covid vaccine adverse events is very small indeed. And most of the remainder are caused by a mental condition caused nocebo effect. Which means that the number of real significant events is incredibly small.

Every pharmaceutical causes adverse events. Aspirin and Paracetamol regularly kill people who don’t want to die. The female contraceptive pill causes blood clots. If you read up about all the drugs in your house you would be shocked. So it is about balancing the good done against the potential for harm. A moral dilemma the pharmaceutical companies have faced since their very inception. And with the Covid vaccines the balance is immensely on the side of the good done.

Just by way of illustration, try and guess which common drug this is:

Hepatic
Common (1% to 10%): Increased aspartate aminotransferase

Rare (less than 0.1%): Increased hepatic transaminases

Frequency not reported: Liver failure[Ref]

Gastrointestinal
Very common (10% or more): Nausea (up to 34%), Vomiting (up to 15%)

Common (1% to 10%): Abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, dyspepsia, enlarged abdomen

Frequency not reported: Dry mouth[Ref]

Hypersensitivity
Postmarketing reports: Anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity reactions[Ref]

Hematologic
Common (1% to 10%): Anemia, postoperative hemorrhage

Very rare (less than 0.01%): Thrombocytopenia, leucopenia, neutropenia[Ref]

Dermatologic
Common (1% to 10%): Rash, pruritus

Rare (less than 0.1%): Serious skin reactions such as acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Very rare (less than 0.01%): Pemphigoid reaction, pustular rash, Lyell syndrome[Ref]

Respiratory
Common (1% to 10%): Dyspnea, abnormal breath sounds, pulmonary edema, hypoxia, pleural effusion, stridor, wheezing, coughing[Ref]

Cardiovascular
Common (1% to 10%): Peripheral edema, hypertension, hypotension, tachycardia, chest pain[Ref]

Metabolic
Common (1% to 10%): Hypokalemia, hyperglycemia[Ref]

Nervous system
Common (1% to 10%): Headache, dizziness

Frequency not reported: Dystonia

Musculoskeletal
Common (1% to 10%): Muscle spasms, trismus

Psychiatric
Common (1% to 10%): Insomnia, anxiety

Genitourinary
Common (1% to 10%): Oliguria

Local
Common (1% to 10%): Infusion site pain, injection site reactions

Ocular
Common (1% to 10%): Periorbital edema

Other
Common (1% to 10%): Pyrexia, fatigue

Rare (0.01% to 0.1%): Malaise

15 Comments


  1. 10 of millions? this is total Bullshit Bruce, the vast majority did not need this. Who funded the study? The drug companys themselves via Gavi? How about Mr Bill Gates?

    Reply

    1. Prove your points.
      You can’t because they are lies.
      I provide links to the science.

      Reply

    2. Even the UK governments own website showed that more people were getting side effects, and that those that were dying were predominately vaxxed!

      Reply

  2. You’re the one making false claims!
    You even source the Guardian FFS

    Reply

  3. In August of 2021 the FDA noted that Pfizer had acknowledged the written comments of the FDA and agreed to perform Study C4591022 and entitled it “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Exposure during Pregnancy: A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of Pregnancy and Infant Outcomes in the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS)/MotherToBaby Pregnancy Registry.” (https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download). This is important because FDA Study C4591022 is a type of study that the FDA has defined. The study design document is here:

    Design And Analysis Of Shedding Studies For Virus Or Bacteria Based Gene Therapy And Oncolytic Products Guidance For Industry
    120KB ∙ PDF File
    Read now
    Here is an excerpt from the first paragraph of the document:
    The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)/Office of Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies (OCTGT) is issuing this guidance to provide you, sponsors of virus or bacteria-based gene therapy products (VBGT products)1 and oncolytic viruses or bacteria (oncolytic products) with recommendations on how to conduct shedding studies during preclinical and clinical development. For purposes of this guidance, the term “shedding” means release of VBGT or oncolytic products from the patient through one or all of the following ways: excreta (feces); secreta (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids etc.); or through the skin (pustules, sores, wounds). Shedding is distinct from biodistribution because the latter describes how a product is spread within the patient’s body from the site of administration while the former describes how it is excreted or released from the patient’s body. Shedding raises the possibility of transmission of VBGT or oncolytic products from treated to untreated individuals (e.g., close contacts and health care professionals).
    Beyond the implicit admission that the jabs are gene therapies, it is difficult to imagine why Pfizer would agree to do a study on shedding if it cannot happen. With that in mind, I take you back to the question about hepatitis. The first question is how many of these kids are jabbed? The second question is, if hepatitis is an AESI and if the jab might shed could any of these kids be seeing side effects if they are in close contacts with people being jabbed?

    Reply

    2. Strange Bruce…. An old article about the history of Palestine (which was very well done) brought me to search your more recent writings and views. It breaks my heart to see this. No amount of small banter about this topic would suffice to sway you as others are trying to do, none the less I’ll write. Pointing out that even Phizer admitted there was no data efficacy about it working when they released it under an EUA, as they just recently admitted. To the reports that prove it was lab generated and is not conspiracy but in the public domain for those willing to read. For them pushing it on children when it doesn’t stop the spread and they where never in danger or in the high risk range. Also wickedly in that pushing it onto the recommended child vaccines actually creates a legal loophole where they can’t be sued even when the EUA expires. Ever. Simultaneously certain companies, including pharma, have made countless billions upon billions this entire time. The largest wealth transfer in the history of the world actually took place from now until present. The same evil that was spreading the false information about Palestine, are the same evils promoting what was inside this vaccine. Give me an email. I’ll send you the data for you to discern for yourself. From the lies of Natural immunity not working, to the restriction of exercise and sunlight, to the preaching it stopped the spread and the ridiculous moving of the goalpost again and again again, the amount of times what they said was incorrect, which is over 90% of they’re propaganda, it is impossible it was ineptitude. It was purposeful. Fulfilling the Georgia Guidelines inverted commandments.

      I pray you’ll seek and find the truth beyond the propaganda before the next vaccines are given during the next phase pandemic.

      Reply

      1. Raziel, you are a victim of the anti vaxx hoaxers.
        I would bet that you don’t have much scientific education.

        Reply

        1. 12 billion jabs! I must say that’s an incredibly impressive number.

          Reply

  4. Bruce, research is coming out now which link the mRNA-injections to non-Covid excess mortality, see for instance Igor Chudrow substack, Dr. Paul Alexander substack, Dr. Jessica Rose substack.
    Regarding alternative treatments which were censored, see Phil Harper “Digger” A very unusal paper as well as Dr. Tess Laurie substack “A letter to Dr. Andrew Hill”
    Regarding the takedown of Hydroxychlorokin see Dr. Meryl Nass “How a false narrative was created.”
    Regarding fake studies on Ivermectin see Dr. Pierre Kory substack

    Reply

    1. Lasse, you obviously have either not read my article or do not understand it.
      Or you do not understand science.
      The Covid vaccines have been proven to have saved tens of millions of lives in the West.
      Just look at the Chaos in China where the vaccine uptake was lower and the vaccines less effective.

      Reply

      1. China has been enforcing masks and vaccines since the beginning and they’re doing it again. Even as far as barricading people in their homes! How is that “working”? It obviously isn’t or people wouldn’t still be needing to have the umpteenth booster and still wear masks. Fauci himself said the masks don’t work, and the inventor of the PCR test admitted it wasn’t developed for that purpose. Then he “died” – nothing to see here Fauci also admitted that herd immunity is more effective than any vaccine, because we have a God given immune system. I’m a pensioner, never wore a mask, didn’t get the jab, and never caught “Covid”.

        Reply

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.