Firstly in House of Commons politics this will have zero effect. Mark Reckless will be wearing a different badge in the House but he will be thinking and acting the same. The Conservatives are well rid of loose cannons like him, they cost the party a lot of votes.
Secondly the really huge story is Emily Thornberry revealing to the world what the commentators already knew. Labour these days are a metropolitan elite clique who see themselves (misguidedly) as intellectuals and who have total, utter contempt for the working man, who they see as being well beneath them. They have lost touch with the reality that their jobs require the votes of these same working people and that they should be afforded the uttermost respect. Thornberry has opened the world’s eyes to the reality that Labour really are now the nasty party, who do not deserve anyone’s vote. This is a worse moment for them than Gordon Brown’s “bigot” gaffe.
Now to the results.
Mark Reckless (UKIP) 16,867 (42.10%)
Kelly Tolhurst (Conservative) 13,947 (34.81%)
Naushabah Khan (Labour) 6,713 (16.76%)
Clive Gregory (Green) 1,692 (4.22%)
Geoff Juby (Lib Dem) 349 (0.87%)
In 2010 it was:
Conservative: 23604 (49.2%)
Labour: 13651 (28.46%)
Liberal Democrat: 7800 (16.26%)
Green: 734 (1.53%)
English Democrat: 2182 (4.55%)
In 2005 the constituency was almost identical but was called Medway:
Bob Marshall-Andrews Labour 17,333 (42.2%)
Mark Reckless Conservative 17,120 (41.7%)
Geoffrey Juby Liberal Democrat 5,152 (12.5%)
Bob Oakley UK Independence Party 1,488 (3.6%)
Some analysis:
Mark Reckless had a terrible day. He was the sitting MP plus he had the advantage of by-election protest votes. Yet his vote share went down from 49.2% to 42.1%. Come the 2015 General Election when voters are voting for the Prime Minister and the economy he will surely lose his seat. Nigel Farage, as ever, came out with a disingenuous lie. He tried to extrapolate this results to hundreds of seats won at the General Election. But in those seats he doesn’t have the sitting MP. And, of course, the senior BBC correspondent didn’t pull him up on this.
Kelly Tolhurst did brilliantly. The Conservatives always do badly in by-elections, when the results don’t really matter. Yet she has gone from zero to nearly 35% of the votes. This must have all the other parties very worried indeed. General election day will see her easily win.
Labour are in utter meltdown. Look at the effect of their leadership on this constituency. Tony Blair 42.2%, Gordon Brown 28.46%, Ed Miliband 16.76%. The party really could be finished, they have lost all relevance to their previous voter base and have a leader who is universally laughed at.
Liberal Democrats. Goodbye. 349 votes. The lowest ever in history for a party that is in power. General Election day 2015 will be a huge train crash. And there is no way out.
The election really does confirm my previous analysis, why the Labour party could be in terminal decline and why the Conservatives will win the 2015 General Election. Both those articles were written before Emily Thornberry revealed the contempt that Labour have for their voters. So my position has now been further reinforced.
Permalink
Bruce, what is your opinion of the good showing for the Green Party? Do you think that in a general election they may take significant votes away from Labour as well as the LibDems?
Permalink
Bob.
The Green Party contain two intellectual stupidities, being Luddites and being socialists. So they are doubly damaging to society. Just look at the mess they have made of Brighton.
They are a new home for sandal wearing lentil weavers who formerly vote Libdem.
Permalink
“Kelly has gone from zero to nearly 35% of the votes.” What complete rubbish, the blues dropped from 49% to 35%. That’s a drop! That’s not a rise for the new candidate!
Tory, Labour and Lib Dems all dropped. UKIP and Greens are on the rise. UKIP may not win in the General Election, but to pretend Kelly and the Tories have made a huge 35% increase is a complete lie.
Permalink
Simon,
So you are saying that if the ballot papers did not have the candidate’s names on them, just the party names, then the results would have been exactly the same.
Obvious tosh.
Permalink
Bruce, I did not ask you what your opinion of the Green Party was – I could have guessed that. What I asked was – love ’em or hate ’em what effect did you think they will have on the General Election. This is what the New Statesman thinks. http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2014/11/who-are-green-partys-supporters-and-should-labour-be-worried
Permalink
Bob,
I think FPTP will stifle nearly all Green effort. They are attracting some disaffected Libdem votes, but not enough. (I keep an eye on YouGov polls, I think they are the best). They have run the local authority in Brighton and Hove and they have done so very badly. This will put people off giving them any more power.